Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 3:52:16 GMT -5
Judges and judges at the São Paulo Court of Justice will receive food assistance worth R$ per day and another R$ for arrears since The decision was taken this Wednesday by the Special Body of São Paulo court and will cover all magistrates in São Paulo and will cost R$ million to the public treasury.
The justification for granting the benefit contrary to an opinion issued by the TJ's Salary Commission is the equality of the State Court with the Federal Court the Labor Court and the Federal Public Ministry which already receive the funds.
The only judge who opposed the payment of the benefit was the vicepresident of the court Gonzaga Franceschini who went so far as to say that the food allowance was immoral. TSartori emphasizes that the payment of arrears in a privileged manner indicates the formation of a parallel administration. He highlights that judges Alceu Navarro Fábio Gouvêa and Vianna Cotrim were members of the Court's Budget Committee. For Sartori there are indications that the three and the former presidents of the Court of Justice had associated themselves in a stable and permanent manner BTC Number Data to commit an undetermined series of administrative offenses during the Bellocchi and Vianna Santos administrations.
Judge Luiz Pantaleão suggested to the collegiate that administrative proceedings be initiated against judge Alceu Penteado Navarro and that the TSE be informed so that that court could evaluate the convenience of taking some action. Judge Walter de Almeida Guilherme highlighted that even if there is no action on the part of the TSE the penalty of availability or compulsory retirement imposed by the TJSP would already cause the judge to be removed from the presidency of the TRE.
he judge questioned whether a judge who receives an average of R$ per month would need the benefit.
The judge also highlighted that most judges have lunch at home before going to the registry office or at the court in which they work and that the Federal Constitution establishes that judges' allowances must — and already cover — housing food health leisure etc.
Regarding the asymmetry defended by President Ivan Sartori Franceschini stated that instead of requesting parity with other powers the TJSP could set an example by waiving the funds and even contesting the receipt through class entities. “If there are bad examples they should not be followed” said the judge.
In response to his deputy Sartori said that “each and every worker whether in the private or public sector and even the highest position in the Executive Branch receives food assistance which is the right of any worker”. Sartori also made a point of reminding Francisquini that a judge at the beginning of his career receives R$ and not as the judge had said.
The justification for granting the benefit contrary to an opinion issued by the TJ's Salary Commission is the equality of the State Court with the Federal Court the Labor Court and the Federal Public Ministry which already receive the funds.
The only judge who opposed the payment of the benefit was the vicepresident of the court Gonzaga Franceschini who went so far as to say that the food allowance was immoral. TSartori emphasizes that the payment of arrears in a privileged manner indicates the formation of a parallel administration. He highlights that judges Alceu Navarro Fábio Gouvêa and Vianna Cotrim were members of the Court's Budget Committee. For Sartori there are indications that the three and the former presidents of the Court of Justice had associated themselves in a stable and permanent manner BTC Number Data to commit an undetermined series of administrative offenses during the Bellocchi and Vianna Santos administrations.
Judge Luiz Pantaleão suggested to the collegiate that administrative proceedings be initiated against judge Alceu Penteado Navarro and that the TSE be informed so that that court could evaluate the convenience of taking some action. Judge Walter de Almeida Guilherme highlighted that even if there is no action on the part of the TSE the penalty of availability or compulsory retirement imposed by the TJSP would already cause the judge to be removed from the presidency of the TRE.
he judge questioned whether a judge who receives an average of R$ per month would need the benefit.
The judge also highlighted that most judges have lunch at home before going to the registry office or at the court in which they work and that the Federal Constitution establishes that judges' allowances must — and already cover — housing food health leisure etc.
Regarding the asymmetry defended by President Ivan Sartori Franceschini stated that instead of requesting parity with other powers the TJSP could set an example by waiving the funds and even contesting the receipt through class entities. “If there are bad examples they should not be followed” said the judge.
In response to his deputy Sartori said that “each and every worker whether in the private or public sector and even the highest position in the Executive Branch receives food assistance which is the right of any worker”. Sartori also made a point of reminding Francisquini that a judge at the beginning of his career receives R$ and not as the judge had said.